Midvale’s All Shook Up Ain’t No Friend of Mine

Midvale Main Street Theatre - All Shook Up - PosterMIDVALE — As my husband, teenage son, and I entered the theatre to see All Shook Up, black and white videos of ‘50s singers such as the Big Bopper, Buddy Holly, and others played on a screen at the back of the stage. This was fun and lively and made me look forward to a raucous night of Elvis tunes. The pre-show entertainment was a troupe of eight little girls dancing and singing to ‘50s tunes. These kids were cute, but I wasn’t sure why they were performing. They were, as most kid groups are, having more fun than pursuing a career path and it seemed a rather odd opening act. I wondered how these little kids could be prefacing something that would surely be great. I mean, Elvis? That ought to really rock the house.

It didn’t. To be very honest, the confusing and pointless pre-show was a dismal prelude of things to come. In one short statement, All Shook Up was a mess from beginning to end. The problems were numerous and consistent.

In the lead role, Cassidy Ross looked comfortable onstage and did well as both the tomboyish Natalie and as disguised sidekick Ed, but her voice and emotional portrayal were above average but not stellar. She has a decent voice, but her duets with Chad, such as “Follow That Dream,” didn’t have the warmth and yearning one would expect with future sweethearts. I wanted more passion from her. Lorraine, played by Alexandria Zinov sometimes talked too fast, and seemed much younger than the character’s age of sixteen, though her voice was harmonic and sweet. Andy Harris, who played Dean, is a pretty good actor, but had a weak singing voice. Dean and Lorraine were the youngest of the show’s star-crossed lovers, and their performances were strong enough when together that their scenes came across as cute. Sterling Young, who plays the Elvis-type “Roustabout” Chad, is woefully miscast, as he is not the right type for Elvis and has a weak voice. However, his scenes with Natalie’s dad, Jim (gamely played by Jim Schroeder), were quite sweet. Though neither singer was very in tune on their own, together they harmonized well and displayed a little oomph in their duets.

Jim’s scenes with his eventual love, Sylvia, played by Eve Speer, are also rather tender. Jim Schroeder, who plays Jim, had an endearing Aw Shucks attitude of putting his hands in his pockets when he was embarrassed or shy that made him a very likeable character. His scenes with his daughter Natalie didn’t have much warmth, but his yearning for Sandra and then his final realization that he loved his good friend Sylvia worked for me. Speer is truly the only standout performer in the whole play, as she could both act and sing well. There were some other actors in the show that were passable, such as Sara McDonald as Mayor Matilda and Ryan Honeycutt as Dennis. McDonald carried a pink bullhorn (a fun prop) and was sufficiently bossy for the part. She also had the best costumes, and her hats and gloves were a nice touch. Honeycutt  had his nerd game on pretty well, but seemed too young for the eventual romance with Sandra, played by Liz Rowly Hilst. Hilst can sing well, though her songs went higher than her voice did. And she played her part well, but I imagine she struggled trying to figure out what to do with such a strange character. She plays Sandra, who is supposed to be a rather educated curator in an art museum (in a little hick town?) but becomes a sexual tigress when she reads a Shakespeare sonnet from a secret admirer.

Costume Mistress Jan Harris’ costumes were pretty and cool (depending on the scene), especially in the “Jailhouse Rock” number with silver portable bars that reminded me of the original Elvis video of this song. The costumes were good in this song, too–everyone wearing black and white. Though the musical aspect of this song was disappointing, the visual of this was good. Mayor Matilda had some of the cutest hats of seen onstage. The set decoration throughout the show was nice in a black background kind of way, and I especially like the winding staircase of stage right that lit up with lights whenever Chad came down the stairs. The other scene that stands out in my mind is in the museum with all the statues, played by actors. They stood still until it was time to dance, and their Grecian and Roman costumes were fancy, colorful, and effective. Unfortunately, one of the highlights of the show was when the mechanical door with a hanging skeleton inside of it kept maniacally opening and closing during the wedding scene. The sound from the singers was a little weak as they only had hanging microphones instead of individual mics.

The whole cast numbers, “Blue Suede Shoes”, “C’mon Everybody”, and “All Shook Up” were difficult for me to watch, as many of the chorus members didn’t seem to remember they were onstage consistently and then all of a sudden would become animated. I was bothered that many chorus members didn’t really know what to do with their bodies and sort of stood there with their arms hanging down and their feet still.  The last number, “Burnin’ Love” was probably the worst group song—with singers and dancers all over the place (and not in a good way). Though the energy was high, the music was flat, and frankly, I was more than ready for the show to end. The exceptions to the unfortunate singing numbers were “Can’t Help Falling in Love”, which was tender in all the right places. “Ain’t All Right” was pretty good, too, with good energy and lots of fun.

Many of the solo songs were similarly disappointing. Sterling Young’s disappointing opener, “Jailhouse Rock” was painful because of some off key singing. It’s clear that Young tried his best, but this show’s lead needs the drama, charisma, and physique of the young Elvis. Dennis’ solo, “It Hurts Me” was flat and disappointed me as I really loved Ryan Honeycutt’s acting. Jim’s solo, “One Night with You”, too was flat, but his acting was pleasing and it was nice to see an adult play an adult part. For their next show, I would suggest that Midvale Main Street Theatre find a good music director who can help the cast members polish their songs.

The dancing was one of the brighter aspects of All Shook Up. Choreographers Halee Balash and Cassidy Ross wisely chose dance steps that looked fun, but weren’t too difficult for their performers to execute. The best dance number was “Devil in Disguise,” which featured old women dancing with their walkers. I will also mention that the show had one outstanding dancer, Alyssa Alger, who had a duet with one of the male dancers. She added some class to the dances.

So to sum up, out of 29 songs, three were good.

As for the actual script, it is a combination of Shakespeare’s women-playing-men comedy ruse combined with Footloose. Though the audience was filled with young children and the little dancing girls appeared in a few scenes, All Shook Up was about as scandalous onstage as Elvis was in his first few televised performances. There was profanity, numerous uses of deity, and one scene where Sandra screams, “Make love to me!” and then pounces on her intended lover. I realize that because this is a copyrighted script, it’s unlawful to change the wording in any way. Appropriateness aside, the story is sort of cheesy and not terribly humorous. Basically, the few laughs in the show were not part of the script, but goofs from the actors or from technical issues. I feel this was a bad choice on the part of Midvale Main Street Theater.

It is plain that this is a small town production with a limited talent pool and everyone, especially director Tammy Ross, were clearly doing their best. I will give them those props times ten. It also looked like they had fun working on the show and were having a ball performing. I will say, the house was almost full and there were numerous hoots, applause and much adulation from the crowd. Clearly, Midvale comes and supports its arts. However, unless you have a loved one in this show, I wouldn’t spend my time or my money going to see All Shook Up.

All Shook Up plays at Midvale Main Street Theater (7711 South Main Street, Midvale,) Thursdays, Fridays, and Saturdays at 7 PM and Saturdays at 2 PM through May 21. Tickets are $12-15. For more information, visit www.midvaletheatre.com.

About Jennifer Leigh Mustoe

Jennifer Leigh Mustoe is a graduate of BYU with a degree in Humanities and theater minor from Saddleback Community College in Mission Viejo, CA. One of her claims to fame is she is the daughter of Bozo the Clown (Jim Chapin) and starred in several TV commercials when she was a baby. Her father, not surprisingly, was producing commercials by then. When not writing reviews for UTBA, Jen is a freelance editor, acting in shows herself , being a stage and band mom for her son Caden, who usually accompanies her to her UTBA reviewing and supplies a teenager's perspective, going to movies, hanging out with her English teacher husband, jogging with her 4 Huskies, or riding one of her 4 horses. She also is producing a short film, and is a member of the Spanish Fork Community Theater board. She loves being one of the UTBA reviewers and is amazed and pleased with the quality of live theater in Utah. Play on! Please follow my blog at: http://bozosdaughter.blogspot.com/

  • http://www.facebook.com/eve.speer Eve Speer

    I’m not really sure how to respond to this review. I love performing with Midvale Main Street Theatre. It’s a wonderful and inclusive community.  I feel like this reviewer missed the point. theatre is about community.  I prefer to take my reviews from the warm and happy crowds.
    Is there room for improvement? Always. But this play is a shared experience between new talents and experienced talents where we all get to create a night of fun with the audiences. Tammy Ross could have shortened the experience and taken the little girls out of the play–but those little girls get to share their talents as a part of the community.  I treasure this feeling I get when I work with Midvale Main Street. I feel sorry that @Jennifer Leigh missed the genuine sense of community they’ve created. She completely missed the mark.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000102316547 Stone Kalisa

     I am enthused every time I go to Midvale Main Street Theatre. I am very grateful to be given the opportunity to perform there. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but this amazing cast deserved a better review than we were given. Everybody gave every show there all and they portrayed their characters to the pinnacle of the amazing abilities. The young girls were given a chance to be in a production and they are. just. young. girls. who should have fun on stage and not be pursuing a professional career at such an age. I feel that this cast has done a great job and will continue to excel, every member of the show was extremely talented and though we respect your opinion, we do not agree and are very disappointed in being treated in such a brutish way.   

  • Halee Ballash

    As a lifelong performer, pursuer, and teacher of the arts, I know a few things about reviews… and the arts!  @Jennifer Leigh, your opinion will always be heard in art, as judgement of art is often based on opinion (opinion of technique, opinion of artistry, etc.)  Without judgement and criticism, there can be no growth.  Some opinions, though heard, are not validated.  May I make a few suggestions that will hopefully further validate your opinions in the future?  First, know which show you will be attending, and familiarize yourself with the characters.  Is this a children’s production?  Is this a farce?  Should I be expecting impersonators?  One who has even youtubed the original broadway cast of ”All Shook Up” would know not to expect impersonations or a lack of dirty jokes.  Second, do not speak of what you do not know.  The ages of the actors in real life are appropriate to the ages of the characters they portray.  Alex (Lorraine) is 16.  Ryan (Dennis) and Liz (Sandra) are both in their mid-twenties.  Third, read the program, or your review, more thoroughly before posting.  Jim does not yearn for the “curator, Matilda,” he yearns for Sandra.  Andy Harris did not act the role of “Dennis”.  Fourth, be aware of where you are.  You were attending and reviewing a community production.  These productions are recreational and educational by nature.  In education we do not belittle.  We do not call actors fat.  We do not expect career excellence from children.  We do not expect the hard-working people who serve their community to be replaced, as if we should fire our volunteers who have not yet acheived perfection.  In conclusion, your review was harsh, unneccessary, and belittling.  As the talented choreographer whose choreography you almost did not put down, I wish I could take that semi-positive review to heart.  However, your review was so unvalidated that good or bad, right or wrong, it has all been voided by your carelessness.  Hopefully you will continue doing what you do but with more caution and care.  We all make mistakes and I hope you will take responsibility for this one.

    • http://www.davemortensen.com Dave Mortensen

      Thanks for your comment, Hallee. I’ve updated the misnamed character, but would appreciate it if you tell me who does play Dennis. We’d be happy to make that correction as well.

      I stand by Jennifer’s review and appreciate her honest, public opinion of the show. All of her comments were observations and how she received the show. She acknowledged that others enjoyed it far more than her. I don’t believe there are any personal attacks in her review.

      We certainly don’t claim to be THE opinion of the show. We’re just ONE opinion. We encourage other patrons to please post their own receptions of the production. If our review results in a flood of positive opinions of the show being posted publicly, that would be pretty cool.

      But like it says in our mission and FAQ, our primary goal is to raise awareness of our theatre community, and to strengthen it. I’m grateful for our team of reviewers willing to take the risk of posting their opinions on our site.

      • Halee Ballash

        Dave, I appreciate your willingness to stand up for your volunteers.  I am simply doing the same.  The re-writes are much appreciated and take this very poorly written review up a notch.  I really hope Jennifer was somehow chastised for posting such a flawed review.  If this were my business, hobby… whatever it is…. I would take some pride in the caliber of the reviews posted, as I see you do.  In all my years in this industry, that was one of the poorest reviews I have ever read, and this has nothing to do with it’s content.  I have heard bad reviews.  I have heard great reviews.  We all are entitled to our opinion, but this particular opinion was presented with a lack of educated insight and a harsh tone that seemed intended to hurt and degrade.  I am not familiar with your site.  However, this being my first experience on Utah Theater Bloggers, I would love to see how you further handle public degradation and slander by your reviewers, volunteer or not.

        • http://www.davemortensen.com Dave Mortensen

          Halee, I’ll continue to thank you for your comments on our volunteer theater blog. This discussion is part of the reason the UTBA was started. Too few opinions on too few productions were being shared in a public forum.

          We certainly seek no forgiveness in our writing. My mention of “volunteer” was simply directed to say that we are not going to ask that our reviewers dedicate more time than attending and writing about a production. Now, if members of the community would like to dedicate that (or more) time to our cause, we welcome them to join us. We would love a few more reviewers to come on board! Just mouse over “more info” at the top of this page and select “Become a Member.”

          Lastly, I didn’t read a harsh tone in Jennifer’s review and neither did our Assistant Editor. Had we identified examples of public degradation or slander we certainly would have removed it. If you believe we let something slip through, please, let me know. We’d be happy to reevaluate specific examples. That’s the beauty of a blog. Corrections can be made.

    • http://www.davemortensen.com Dave Mortensen

      One more comment, since our reviewers are not paid, we do not ask them to research production beforehand. Their time in traveling, attending, and then writing their review (and re-writes) is all that we can ask of them.

      Most theatre patrons in Utah will not carry out much research on a show before attending. That’s why we feel going into a show blind is a valid way to measure how the performance is received by its audience.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jessalyn-Wood/635066503 Jessalyn Wood

    I disagree with the majority of this review and I saw the show the very same night. This isn’t a professional production. It is a community theater filled with volunteers and I thought that they did exceptionally well. As for the pre-act. They are just little girls. Shouldn’t they be having more fun that pursuing a career path? The whole point of a community production is to bring people together and to have FUN. Constructive criticism is a good thing, but I find nothing ‘constructive’ about that statement.

    I felt entertained throughout the whole play. Although in productions like this there will be technical difficulties and minor ‘goofs’ from the actors, that was NOT all that I laughed for. I thought some of the jokes were really funny. The dance numbers were inventive and had many lifts that added spice to the show. I do agree with @Jennifer Leigh about the dance duet in “Can’t Help Fallin in Love”. It was by far my favorite part to watch in the play and was an outstanding number. The visuals that came from the group songs were very entertaining and I enjoyed how they ended, particularly in “Ain’t All Right” and “Burnin Love”. The actors all gave good energy when singing and dancing. The costumes were fun and the scene changes were quick. My favorite character was Dennis, and I found Ryan Honeycutt more than just ‘passable’ at the part.  They are all talented performers and I would suggest to others to go see All Shook Up or any other Midvale Main Street Theater production.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=821371068 Joshua Hilst

    I want to agree with Halee’s comments here. I don’t see how begging off sloppy review practices with “we’re just volunteers” functions in the context of a review that bashes a show full of volunteers.

  • http://www.davemortensen.com Dave Mortensen

    Thanks, Josh. I’m glad another person has joined this Utah theater conversation! I don’t believe that our reviewer “bashed” the show. That seems like it would imply malicious intentions. Who would do that? We certainly have nothing to gain by “bashing” a show. We firmly believe that there is no such thing as a 100% amazing production or 100% horrible production. There is beauty and value in every show we see.

    For community theater productions we are generally incredibly forgiving. Here in Utah it seems that everyone has been involved in community theater and we’re certainly not the exception. It would be inappropriate to judge a community level production at professional standards, and I assure you, we don’t.

    Again, thank you for taking the time to read about the show, read thru the comments, and write one of your own. I would personally like to invite you to post your own review of the production. We’d love to hear your thoughts on the show!

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=821371068 Joshua Hilst

      Dave,

      Your reply comes across as somewhat glib and belies the fact
      that you’ve completely avoided my argument, which is, quite simply, if you
      deserve slack for problematic reviews (as volunteers), then why are you holding
      community theater performers to a different standard? You say above that you
      don’t feel you are looking for slack. Why, then, do you insist that we bear in
      mind that you are a “volunteer” corps of reviewers?

      Moreover, if this isn’t “bashing,” then you and I clearly
      differ in our definitions of bashing. What do you have to gain? It doesn’t take
      a media studies major to tell you that bad press brings in more eyeballs than
      good press (a process in which I must admit I am now complicit).

      That said, I agree with some of Bill’s comments regarding
      the disparity between the two separate productions of “All Shook Up.” If could make a suggestion, I
      would consider having the same people review similar (or the same) shows. It
      stands to reason that if a person likes a particular type of show, they are
      more likely to write to the kind of audience that will go see that show. I
      would also suggest that you understand something about the shows, yourself. Why
      would you send someone who seems somewhat sensitive (“numerous uses of the deity”) to a show with
      sexuality and language in it? Would you send such a person to review “Equus,”
      or (heaven forefend) “Urinetown”? Know your audience, and, better yet, know
      your reviewers.

      • http://www.davemortensen.com Dave Mortensen

        I support our reviewer’s take on the production as valid and fair. I believe it was critiqued at the same standard we critique all community theatre productions. Granted, there will always be differences between reviewers. I welcome you to click on the reviewer’s name and see other shows she has reviewed and see how those other shows compare.

        My comments are not meant to offend. I really do appreciate the insights. We make no profit on this site. It’s managed purely as a service to the theatre community. If our intent was to increase traffic, and if what you say about negative reviews driving traffic is true, then it’s amazing we aren’t more negative in all of our reviews. I think that as you familiar yourself with the site you’ll see that we are generally quite positive with most shows. That’s because we love theatre.

        because of the number of shows we cover it’s fairly impossible right now for us to match reviewers with the scrutiny you suggest. We welcome you or anyone else to join our cause or start your own blog to help raise awareness of theatre in Utah.

        Again, I do sincerely appreciate your comments and welcome further thoughts via comment or personal email. Whatever you prefer.

  • Dana Anquoe

    For me, this review was helpful. I have limited money and, while I love seeing live theater, I would rather save it for worthwhile performances. I don’t think the reviewer bashed the production.  She pointed out several things she did enjoy. The risk in community theater, and I can say that as someone who has directed over 10 shows for a small theater in Lindon, is that you have to use what you can get. Sometimes, the talent will be lacking in certain areas. There is nothing wrong with that; it’s just nice to know, from a potential audience perspective, when that kind of a situation is the case with a production. Personally, I’ve never really wanted to see “All Shook Up”, don’t know much about it, and probably won’t see this show after reading this review. I like UTBA BECAUSE of the honesty of their reviewers. I don’t feel any sort of bias from any of the reviews I read on this sight, unlike with some of the larger news outlets.

    And let’s be honest…we’ve ALL been to shows that weren’t up to par. And we’ve all probably been a part of shows that were lacking in some aspects and excelled in others, ESPECIALLY in community theater. I applaud Jennifer for being honest and not sugar-coating her experience. And maybe that experience would have been different if she had known someone in the show, as with some of the audience who saw the same performance. A review is merely an opinion of one person in an audience, no more no less. Most reviewers don’t pretend to speak for every single person in that particular audience and, it seems to me, Jennifer is no different. I’m sure people will see the show in spite of the review and others will avoid it; that’s, in my understanding, the point of a review.

    Take my comments for what their worth; I just wanted to voice my own opinion of how I, personally, read the review in question.

  • Anonymous

     I would like to thank you for recognizing all the work that goes into doing costumes.  I work very hard with the director to make the costumes appropriate for the scene, the character and to stay true to the script.  However I am confused with your comments on the metal jail bars.  I did not make the bars, they are considered scenery.  And the “colorful” statue costumes were all white, with one exception, two African American boys wearing them.  But as I am not their mother I cannot take any credit for making them.  This has been a great production to be apart of and I am sorry that your experience was not what you expected.credit for making them.  This has been a great production to be apart of and I am sorry that your experience was not what you expected.

    • http://www.davemortensen.com Dave Mortensen

      Thanks for your comments, Jan!

  • Anonymous

    I’ve had good and bad reviews, and I will always value the opinion of others. However, it is hard to take any review seriously when its writing is deeply flawed. I haven’t seen writing this bad since my sophomore year in high school. The thoughts were disconnected and random, the comments disorganized, and the point of view contradicts itself. I understand that volunteers must be given some “wiggle room” but as this woman did not give any to this hard working cast, I see no reason why she deserves it at this point. If you are going to write such a scathing review, do it with some class.

    • http://www.davemortensen.com Dave Mortensen

      Thanks for your comment, Amanda!

  • Bill Shulz

    I live in this area and I enjoy seeing as much theatre in the community as my budget allows. I love All Shook Up and had the pleasure of seeing Midvale’s production last Friday. Was it perfect? No. Was is great? No. But did I love every minute of it? Yes, I did! The cast was bursting with energy!

    That being said, I agreed with a lot of this review. A few people were miscast, ABSOLUTELY. The talent wasn’t Broadway caliber by any means. Or even say, a Scera production. But they didn’t claim to be.

    My biggest problem with review, and this site, for that matter, is how vastly the reviewers can vary. If you read the review for All Shook Up in Draper, like I did, you were probably expecting a FABULOUS show that was thoroughly enjoyable.  Anyone who actually saw that production would know that it was a waste of money, gas, and 3 hours I will  regrettably never get back. But the reviewer lauded that show. Highly recommended it, and gave it a very positive review. Midvale’s production was leagues ahead of Draper’s. And unfortunately, a lot of people won’t get to see that because of this review.

    Was this review slander? No, not at all. UTTB had every right to post this as is. But it is a very harsh and negative review. And while I agree with most of the review, it is misleading.

    I love Midvale and will continue to give them my business, I just am sorry for all the business that will be deterred because of this misleading review.

    • http://www.davemortensen.com Dave Mortensen

      Those are great comments, Bill. Any suggestions on how to approach the varying levels of criticism you referenced?

    • Anonymous

       Bill,

      As an occasional reviewer for this site
      (and actually the one who wrote the Draper ASU review) I think that I might be
      able to provide a little insight into the consistency issue. First of all, I’m
      sorry if you felt duped by my review, I really did enjoy myself even though the
      production quality was pretty terrible. But like I said, it really felt like
      watching a group of friends perform something in their house, and the audience
      that night was infectious. I really was laughing pretty hard. I had seen better
      performances of this show, but for what it was, they did pretty good.

       

      As for the inconsistency with
      reviewers, I honestly think that it comes down to what we’re seeing here. I’ll
      be honest, I was more interested in the comments than the actual review, but we
      see that when someone speaks their mind they are lambasted for what they said.

       

      I’ve actually had a similar experience
      as a reviewer. I reviewed a show here in Utah that I had seen previously done
      by a professional company in London. So, obviously the one here was not nearly
      as good but still charged nearly as much per ticket. I still tried to remain
      positive, but I tried to voice my concerns and be as honest as possible. The
      backlash was pretty harsh, in my opinion. I was told that I didn’t know what I
      was talking about, that I didn’t understand because I was from a different
      generation, that my views were unfounded, and my credentials were outright
      called into question. Not quite what I wanted to hear from a review in which I
      was actually recommending they see the show. (My favorite comment was that I was
      wrong and the actress I mentioned must have done well because the commenter
      knew the director and knew that he would never cast someone who was wrong for
      the part.)

       

      But we still tend to have
      “fan-boys” and others who claim that it’s “just community theater” so
      don’t judge it. Which really isn’t fair, because I feel that the majority of
      theater done in Utah tries to fit under this umbrella with high-schools, dinner
      theaters, and the hodge-podge of “community” groups. They’re everywhere (and I
      love them). So if a reviewer can’t be honest about how they felt about a “community”
      show for fear of backlash, then it turns into reviews where we try really
      really hard not to hurt anyone’s feelings (especially when you add child actors
      into the mix), which might make it sound like lauding a show that maybe doesn’t
      really deserve it.

       

      I also understand that just by saying it’s
      a community show they aren’t saying “don’t judge it” outright. Most of the time
      it is “judge it fairly” or rather “judge it according to what it is”. But what
      this translates into is “Tell me what you thought, but only say nice things”. The
      excuse of “community” discredits any criticism of acting, tech, direction, and
      so on because we can hide behind the lack of resources excuse. If I didn’t like
      something, it will be written off as my not understanding what they had to work
      with, or the value of the experience of those on stage. But as you mentioned,
      within “community” there is still a disparity. So how do we, as reviewers and
      patrons deal with not being able to say negative things while still letting the
      audience know it wasn’t up to snuff?

       

      At a certain point I think we as a community
      need to learn how to disagree with each other and understand that people are
      looking for different things from different levels of theater. My idea of “community”
      level quality and yours might vary significantly. And even more ideally I wish
      that we could get to a point where reviewers could be honest and the reader
      could just be familiar enough with the reviewer to know whether they tend to
      agree or disagree with their perspective. I have a couple of movie reviewers
      who I consistently disagree with and that actually is one of the ways I decide
      if I will see a movie or not. But alas, at this point UTBA only has the limited
      resources to send one reviewer from our rotating pool to each show that
      requests for one. There were talks at one point of trying to get multiple
      reviewers to each to get more of a spectrum of views. But in the end, that’s
      the purpose of comments and starting the discussion. Ironically, from this “bad”
      review and the comments that have come from it, audience members going to see
      the show will have a more balanced view. They’ve heard the good (from the
      review and the comments) and they’ve heard the bad (from the review).

       

      Now if only we could get people to
      speak up in the comments against those overly positive reviews we’d be set.

       

      Just my thoughts.

      -Christian

       

      Also, Bill, I really am just trying to
      give insight here, not attack. You just happened to have mentioned a review of
      mine so I felt I would reply to your comment in particular rather than the
      review as a whole.

       

      Also, Also, Sorry about
      the length. It’s late and I’m feeling wordy.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000102316547 Stone Kalisa

     I am enthused every time I go to Midvale Main Street
    Theatre. I am very grateful to be given the opportunity to perform there.
    Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but this amazing cast deserved a
    better review than we were given. Everybody gave every show there all and they
    portrayed their characters to the pinnacle of the amazing abilities. Our
    terrific choreographer, Halee Ballash, our outstanding music directors, Holly
    Evans and Eve Speer, and our fantastic director, Tammy Ross, worked very hard to
    produce this show and they did a great job. It is unfortunate that you felt the
    need to disrespect and slander this cast and this great theatre, for petty
    reasons. The young girls were given a chance to be in a production and they
    are. just. young. girls. who should have fun on stage and not be pursuing a
    professional career at such an age. All Shook Up was the performed with the
    same exact dialogue as it was on Broadway, as you mentioned, but we had no
    control over it, and if you felt that the show was inappropriate or scandalous
    then you should have check before you came to the show. You also should have
    check which characters and actors you are writing about. I feel that this cast
    has done a great job and will continue to excel, every member of the show was
    extremely talented and though we respect your opinion, we do not agree and are
    very disappointed in being treated in such a brutish way. I tried to write this
    comment in an appropriate, respectful, frank and professional way as it should
    have been from the beginning.    

    • http://www.davemortensen.com Dave Mortensen

      I’m so glad you enjoyed working on the show and that you sport local theatre so much! It’s our love for local theatre that created this site. Thank you for sharing your kind words.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jessalyn-Wood/635066503 Jessalyn Wood

    I disagree with the majority of this review and I saw the show the very same night. I loved it. This is not a professional production, and should not be criticized as one. Constructive criticism is a good thing, but I fail to find anything truly constructive about these comments. First off, as for the little girls. Are you suggesting that we hold out for the 8 year olds that ARE pursuing a career in dance? They are supposed to be having fun. That is the point of community theater. To get people in the community together and to have FUN.

    For the characters, I believe casting was done very well. You don’t need a perfect physique to be Elvis, and I thought Sterling Young had the charisma to pull it off. Dennis was by far my favorite character and I thought Ryan Honeycutt was more than just ‘passable’ at the part. I don’t see how there could be more ‘warmth and yearning’ between the two characters of Chad and Natalie in the song, “Follow That Dream” because at that point in the play, they aren’t future lovers. Chad is not returning Natalie’s affections, and I found that Cassidy Ross did a fine job of appearing lovesick for Chad. I also don’t understand why Jennifer Leigh adds in, “I imagine she struggled trying to figure out what to do with such a strange character” when talking about Liz Hilst’s part of Sandra. It seems irrelevant to the review. I could say that I imagine that she had fun with the part, but that doesn’t mean she really did or didn’t. It doesn’t actually have much to do with the viewing of the production and no one but the actress would know whether there is any truth to it.

    I do agree, however, with Jennifer Leigh that the dancing was a bright aspect. Although, I’m not positive about how ‘simple’ the moves were. There were many lifts that added spice to the songs, and the dance duet with Alyssa Alger was positively beautiful and by far my favorite song of the play. The group dances gave great visuals, particularly at the end of “Ain’t All Right” and “Burnin’ Love”. Throughout the whole play, there was constant energy from the actors. Also, for me, more than just three songs were ‘good’. “Can’t Help Fallin In Love” was outstanding. I loved most of the songs.

    This is a community theater, and in productions like this there will always be a few technical difficulties and ‘goofs’ from the actors. However, that was NOT the only reason I was laughing. I laughed at a lot of the jokes in the show, a few of them really funny. And I wasn’t the only one laughing. The review states itself, the crowd liked it. The reviewer is just one opinion, but that’s one out of a nearly full house. I would suggest to go see All Shook Up, or any other Midvale Main Street Theater production. 

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=17818227 Russell Warne

    UTBA assistant editor here. Sorry, I’m behind the curve on this discussion. I’ve been occupied with a family commitment.

    I don’t have much to say because other people have said it quite
    eloquently. But I do think it would be profitable for people to look up
    the reviews for Midvale Main Street Theatre’s other productions (“Hairspray” and “One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest”) and Jennifer Leigh’s other reviews (which you can find by clicking on her name at the top of this review).

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Taylor-Lawrence/100000277343583 Taylor Lawrence

    In my opinion, it is not the brightest idea to give away the ending of a show in the review (Who ends up with who in the end). The point of a review is to see if the show is worth going to. This is quite a spoiler for me.. I am quite upset that the ending was just given away to everyone. 

  • Anonymous

    It is very interesting reading the comments regarding this review. As a matter of fact, I saw the Draper production of All Shook Up and LOVED it!! Possibly one of the best community theater shows I’ve seen in a long time! So, after reading this review of Midvale’s production I had to see it for myself. I feel compelled to comment only because of Bill’s inappropriate remarks comparing the two. The shows are not competing against each other. Done at two different theaters with two different directors and two different casts. Both can be good or bad and stand on their own merits. I feel the reviewers with UTB generally do a good job and I appreciate their honest opinions. If they always sugar coated every show, we would not find them credible at all! I appreciate their insight and experience and they should never be expected to judge a show based on how it compared to another.